Effectiveness of electronic patient reporting outcomes, by a digital telemonitoring platform, for prostate cancer care: the Protecty study.

Research aim and purpose: The benefits of Electronic Patient -Reported Outcomes (e-PRO) for telemonitoring are well established, allowing early detection of illnesses and continuous monitoring of patients. The primary objective of the PROTECTY study was to assess the compliance with patient use of the telemonitoring platform Cureety. An exploratory objective was to assess if the first-month health status is a prognostic factor of progression free-survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for prostate cancer patient. Methods: This prospective study was conducted at the Military Hospital Bégin on prostate cancer patients. Patients were allowed to respond to a symptomatology questionnaire based on CTCAE v.5.0, personalized to their pathology and treatment. An algorithm evaluates the health status of the patient based on the reported adverse events, with a classification into 2 different states: Good Health Status (GHS) and Poor Health status (PHS). Results: Sixty-one patients were enrolled between July 1st, 2020 and September 30th, 2021. The median age was 74.0 (range 58.0-94.0). 78% presented a metastatic stage, and the most represented cancer was mHSPC. Overall, 2,457 questionnaires were completed by the patients, 4.0% resulted in a health classification in to monitor or critical state. 87% of patients were classified in the GHS group. The compliance was 72% in the overall population during the first month, 71% in GHS group and 75% in PHS group. The median follow-up was 8 months. PFS at 6 months was 84% in GHS group vs. 57% in PHS group, p = 0.19. OS at 6 months was 98% in GHS group vs. 83% in PHS group, p = 0.31. Conclusions: Our study showed that compliance was satisfactory. The feasibility of remote monitoring for prostate cancer patients means that they should benefit from its implementation. Our study is also the first to assess the correlation between treatment tolerance and survival. The initial results suggest that e-PRO assessment could help identify in the early stages the patients that require further health assessment and potential therapeutic changes. While further follow-up of more patients will be required, our study highlights the importance of e-PRO in cancer patient care.

Baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as a predictive and prognostic biomarker in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treated with cabazitaxel versus abiraterone or enzalutamide in the CARD study.

BACKGROUND: There is growing evidence that a high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is associated with poor overall survival (OS) for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). In the CARD study (NCT02485691), cabazitaxel significantly improved radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) and OS versus abiraterone or enzalutamide in patients with mCRPC previously treated with docetaxel and the alternative androgen-receptor-targeted agent (ARTA). Here, we investigated NLR as a biomarker. PATIENTS AND METHODS: CARD was a multicenter, open-label study that randomized patients with mCRPC to receive cabazitaxel (25 mg/m2 every 3 weeks) versus abiraterone (1000 mg/day) or enzalutamide (160 mg/day). The relationships between baseline NLR [< versus ≥ median (3.38)] and rPFS, OS, time to prostate-specific antigen progression, and prostate-specific antigen response to cabazitaxel versus ARTA were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier estimates. Multivariable Cox regression with stepwise selection of covariates was used to investigate the prognostic association between baseline NLR and OS. RESULTS: The rPFS benefit with cabazitaxel versus ARTA was particularly marked in patients with high NLR {8.5 versus 2.8 months, respectively; hazard ratio (HR) 0.43 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.27-0.67]; P < 0.0001}, compared with low NLR [7.5 versus 5.1 months, respectively; HR 0.69 (95% CI 0.45-1.06); P = 0.0860]. Higher NLR (continuous covariate, per 1 unit increase) independently associated with poor OS [HR 1.05 (95% CI 1.02-1.08); P = 0.0003]. For cabazitaxel, there was no OS difference between patients with high versus low NLR (15.3 versus 12.9 months, respectively; P = 0.7465). Patients receiving an ARTA with high NLR, however, had a worse OS versus those with low NLR (9.5 versus 13.3 months, respectively; P = 0.0608). CONCLUSIONS: High baseline NLR predicts poor outcomes with an ARTA in patients with mCRPC previously treated with docetaxel and the alternative ARTA. Conversely, the activity of cabazitaxel is retained irrespective of NLR.

Circulating tumor cell thresholds and survival scores in advanced metastatic breast cancer: the observational step of the CirCe01 phase III trial.

The clinical validity of circulating tumor cell (CTC) count changes during chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer patients has been validated, but its clinical utility remains to be demonstrated. We report here the non-randomized run-in phase of the CirCe01 trial which was designed to evaluate CTC changes and thresholds to other palliative prognostic scores and establish CTC thresholds to be used in the randomized part of the study. CTC count (CellSearch®) and other prognostic parameters (serum albumin level, lymphocyte level, LDH level, prognostic inflammatory and nutritional index (PINI) and Barbot's score) were assessed in 56 metastatic breast cancer patients before the first cycle of third line chemotherapy. Early changes of CTC count were correlated with treatment outcome. Independent prognostic markers in multivariate analysis were: low serum albumin (HR = 11.1), poor performance status (HR = 3.8), ≥5 CTC/7.5 ml (HR = 3.8) and triple negative subtype (HER2+ and hormone positive vs triple negative: both HR = 0.2). Among patients with ≥5 CTC/7.5 ml at baseline, a composite criteria (<5 CTC/7.5 ml or relative decrease ≥-70% of the baseline CTC count) showed better prognostication for PFS (p=0.002).

[Neuroendocrine carcinoma of the digestive tract: a literature review]. / Carcinome neuro-endocrine du tractus digestif : revue de la littérature.

Neuroendocrine carcinoma is a rare and agressive malignant tumor, mainly developing at the expense of the respiratory and of the digestive tract. Among the digestive tract, appendix, small bowel, and pancreas are the preferential sites of involvement, other locations have been more rarely reported. Neuroendocrine digestive tumors may present with various symptoms in relationship with their localization and a complex pathophysiology. Diagnosis is often made at an advanced stage, explaining partly the bad prognosis of these tumors. The optimal management of digestive neuroendocrine tumors is rendered difficult by their rarity and by a low number of randomized trials. We review the literature regarding epidemiologic and prognostic features of these rare tumors, their diagnostic and therapeutic care. Potential complications are also discussed.

[Fever and cancer: components of diagnosis for optimal management]. / Fièvre et cancer : éléments de diagnostic pour une prise en charge adaptée.

Fever is defined as a body temperature above 37.8°C in the absence of antipyretic drug. It is a frequent and potentially severe event and its interpretation can be difficult in patients with solid tumors. It is usually alleged that more than half of cancer patients will be affected by the occurrence of this event during the course of their disease. Underlying causes are multiple but most frequent and severe causes include infections, the most life-threatening causes being, firstly, febrile neutropenia and secondly, healthcare-associated infections and more particularly infections related to catheter. Opportunistic infections are much less frequent than in hematology oncology but clinicians should be aware of two severe opportunistic infections: systemic candidiasis and Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia. Fever related to paraneoplastic or tumor necrosis complicates the diagnosis process. Other common causes of fever include venous thromboembolic disease or more rarely treatment related fever. We aim at examining the optimal diagnostic and therapeutic strategies when facing a cancer patient with fever.

[Evans syndrome: be careful of over-diagnosis]. / Syndrome d'Evans: attention aux diagnostics par excès.

INTRODUCTION: Evans syndrome (ES) is characterized by the coexistence of an autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) and immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP). Despite being frequently evocated in the simultaneous presence of anemia and thrombocytopenia, this rare disease only accounts for 0.8 to 3.7% of patients with ITP or AIHA. CASE REPORTS: We report three suspected cases of ES, diagnosed in the presence of thrombocytopenia and hemolytic anemia association, with a positive direct Coombs test in two patients. Standard ES treatment failure and occurrence of additional features subsequently led to correct diagnosis to thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura, myelodysplastic syndrome with AIHA, and ITP with hemorrhagic anemia, respectively. CONCLUSION: Bicytopenias, even in an immunological context, are not sufficient to ascertain ES diagnosis. Our cases illustrate the diagnostic difficulties that may arise in daily practice, and induce over-diagnosis of this rare disease.